Judge Rejects Request For More Time In Illinois Pension Case
The Illinois Supreme Court has rejected a request for an extra month to file arguments by lawyers contesting the law that overhauls a state pension program that is $111 billion in debt.
Attorneys for state employees, retired teachers and others who contest the constitutionality of the law said they needed until March 16.
But the court denied the motion Thursday because it had already agreed to fast track the appeal of a lower court's ruling. The case is scheduled to be heard in March.
Lawmakers changed the law in 2013 to reduce benefits and raise the retirement age to reduce the fiscal hole.
Those challenging the law say constitutionally promised benefits can't be diminished.
- Lawyers Ask Judge to Delay Pension Law Hearing
- Illinois Supreme Court Fast-Tracks Pension Dispute
- Judge Rules Illinois’ Pension Law Unconstitutional
- Judge Hears Arguments For, Against IL Pension Law
- Quinn: No Pension ‘Plan B’ Before Court Ruling
- Moody’s: Ill. Pension Debt Versus Revenue Is Worst
- Illinois Pension Case Might Head To Supreme Court
- Ruling On Pension Suit Could Take Five Months Or More
- TRS: State Will Have To Pick Up More Of Teacher Pensions
- Hold Placed On Illinois Pension Law
- Deal Reached On University Pensions
- SURS Changing Interpretation Of Pension ‘Money Purchase’ Provision
- U Of I: Illinois Pension Overhaul Had Costly Mistake
- Pension Law Could Mean Mass Retirements At State Universities
- Fifth Pension Lawsuit Filed By U Of I, Parkland Employees
- Illinois Unions Sue Over Plan To Cut Pensions
- Retired Teachers Sue State Over Pension Law
- Illinois’ New Pension Law: Examining The Legal Process
- Quinn Signs Pension Overhaul